GuidesComparisonsRX 7600 Vs ARC A750

RX 7600 Vs ARC A750 [Gaming & Overall Comparison]

We will be testing the Arc A750 Vs RX 7600 across various games to find out their performance difference and compare there specs and architectural differences.

Building upon our previous in-depth analysis of the RTX 3090 Ti and RTX 2080 Ti, where we witnessed the exceptional performance of the former, we now turn our attention to a new comparison between two new contenders: the RX 7600 vs Arc A750. With AMD and Intel unveiling their latest GPUs, we delve into the intricate details of these graphics cards.

Key Takeaways

  • Diving into the architectural differences, the RX 7600 leverages the advanced RDNA 3.0, while the Arc A750 utilizes the Generation 12.7 architecture.
  • Furthermore, regarding gaming performance, the RX 7600 leaves the Arc A750 in its wake, delivering an outstanding 23.3% higher FPS performance.
  • Moreover, in the realm of power efficiency, the Arc A750 exhibits a slight advantage over the RX 7600, consuming 1.45% less power on average.
  • Finally, the benchmark analysis demonstrates the Arc A750’s thermal efficiency dominance, surpassing the RX 7600 by a margin of 2.6%.

Comparison Table

Technical Specs Radeon RX 7600 Intel Arc A750
GPU Name Navi 33 DG2-512
Architecture RDNA 3.0 Generation 12.7
Process Size 6nm 6nm
Transistors 13,300 million 21,700 million
Base Clock 1720 MHz 2050 MHz
Boost Clock 2655 MHz 2400 MHz
CUDA Cores 2048 3584
Tensor Cores NA NA
RT Cores 32 28
TMUs 128 224
ROPs 64 112
L1 Cache 128 KB (per SM) TBD
L2 Cache 2 MB 16 MB
Memory Size 8GB 8GB
Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Bus Width 128 bit 256 bit
Memory Bandwidth 288.0 GB/s 512.0 GB/s
TDP 165W 225W
Suggested PSU 450W 550W
Release Date May 24th, 2023 Oct 12th, 2022
Approximate Price 269 USD 289 USD

Differences

  1. Process Node: Firstly, regarding process size, both the Radeon RX 7600 and Arc A750 share the common ground of being built on a 6nm manufacturing process.
  2. Clock Speed: The RX 7600 exhibits a base clock of 1720 MHz and a boost clock of 2655 MHz, while the Arc A750 has a base clock of 2050 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz.
  3. VRAM: Furthermore, the RX 7600 and Arc A750 offer the same capacity of 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM, providing ample memory for handling demanding tasks.
  4. TDP: Additionally, Regarding TDP, the RX 7600 demonstrates a lower power consumption of 165W, while the Arc A750 requires a slightly higher power input of 225W.
  5. Supported Technologies: Lastly, the Arc A750 employs Intel’s XeSS technology, providing advanced upscaling capabilities, while the RX 7600 utilizes AMD’s FSR technology to achieve similar results.

Also Read: ARC A770 vs RTX 3070

RX 7600 Vs Arc A750: Gaming Benchmarks

Now, let’s dive into the realm of in-game performance to unravel the true potential of the Arc A750 and RX 7600. Through meticulous analysis and extensive benchmarking, we’ll explore their gaming prowess and determine which card reigns supreme.

Testing Rig

Here are the specs of the testing rig:

  • CPU: Core i5- 12400F
  • Memory: 32 GB 3600 MHz DDR4 Ram
  • GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7600, Intel Arc A750 
  • Operating System: Windows 10 Pro

Note: Remember that benchmark test results can be influenced by external factors, including ambient temperature, system cooling, background tasks, and driver optimizations. Therefore, considering these variables is crucial for a comprehensive analysis of the performance data.

Let’s delve into the gaming benchmarks and thoroughly compare the performance of the RX 7600 and Arc A750 graphics cards without further ado.

Forza Horizon 5

Forza Horizon 5
Forza Horizon 5 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Starting off, during benchmark tests, the RX 7600 demonstrates its superiority with an average FPS of 133, surpassing the Arc A750’s 97 FPS by a substantial 31.3%.
  • Moreover, in terms of temperature management, the Arc A750 impresses with an average temperature of 67°C, exhibiting an 8.5% cooler operation compared to the RX 7600’s 73°C during thermal testing.
  • In addition, in terms of power consumption, the Arc A750 demonstrates its efficiency by consuming 149.1W, maintaining an 8.2% advantage over the RX 7600’s consumption of 162W.
  • Furthermore, in terms of 1% low performance, the RX 7600 boasts an impressive lead with 115 FPS, surpassing the ARC A750’s performance of 86 FPS by 28.8%.

Also Read: ARC A770 vs RTX 3060 Ti

Grand Theft Auto V

Grand Theft Auto V
Grand Theft Auto V 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Firstly, in terms of average FPS performance, the RX 7600 impresses with 141 FPS, leaving the Arc A750 behind at 95 FPS, resulting in a remarkable 38.9% difference.
  • Moreover, during thermal testing, the Arc A750 showcases excellent temperature control with an average of 62°C, outperforming the RX 7600’s 65°C by a notable 4.7%.
  • Furthermore, the Arc A750 showcases its power efficiency by consuming only 132.2W, exhibiting a 5.7% advantage compared to the RX 7600’s consumption of 140W.
  • In addition, the RX 7600 showcases exceptional 1% low performance with 107 FPS, outperforming the ARC A750’s 68 FPS by a substantial 44.5%.

Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • To begin with, when comparing average FPS, the RX 7600 exhibits a solid performance of 88 FPS, outshining the Arc A750’s 74 FPS by a notable 17.2%.
  • Moreover, transitioning to thermal statistics, the Arc A750 maintains a commendable average temperature of 66°C, while the RX 7600 closely follows at 67°C, resulting in a marginal 1.5% difference.
  • Furthermore, while going over power efficiency, the Arc A750 impresses with its consumption of 160.9W, showcasing a marginal 0.6% difference compared to the RX 7600’s consumption of 162W.
  • In addition, when it comes to 1% low performance, the ARC A750 achieves 52 FPS, while the RX 7600 demonstrates superior performance with 63 FPS, resulting in a notable difference of 19.1%.

The Witcher 3 Next-Gen

The Witcher 3 Next-Gen
The Witcher 3 Next-Gen 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Starting off, it is worth noting that the Arc A750 records an average FPS of 113, while the RX 7600 follows closely with 116 FPS, resulting in a minor 2.6% disparity.
  • In addition, both the Arc A750 and RX 7600 exhibit similar thermal performance with an average temperature of 66°C vs 67°C, resulting in an identical 1.5% difference.
  • Furthermore, the Arc A750 consumes 146.7W, while the RX 7600 closely follows with lower power consumption at 145W, resulting in a marginal 1.1% difference in power consumption.
  • Additionally, the ARC A750 achieves 83 FPS in 1% low performance, while the RX 7600 follows closely at 78 FPS, resulting in a marginal difference of 6.2%.

Also Read: RX 6700 XT Vs RTX 3070 Ti

Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered

Marvel's Spider-Man Remastered
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Firstly, when transitioning to average FPS, the RX 7600 showcases its capabilities with a respectable 111 FPS, surpassing the Arc A750’s performance of 96 FPS by 14.4%.
  • Moreover, when it comes to thermal efficiency, the Arc A750 shines with an average temperature of 62°C, showcasing a remarkable 7.7% cooler operation compared to the RX 7600’s 67°C.
  • Furthermore, while going over power efficiency, the Arc A750 shines with its consumption of 140.4W, showcasing a significant 13% advantage over the RX 7600’s consumption of 160W.
  • In addition, when considering 1% low performance, the ARC A750 achieves 56 FPS, while the RX 7600 demonstrates stronger performance with 65 FPS, resulting in a difference of 14.8%.

Hogwarts Legacy

Hogwarts Legacy
Hogwarts Legacy 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Starting off, in benchmark tests, the Arc A750 falls behind with an average FPS of 83, whereas the RX 7600 delivers a commendable 112 FPS, establishing a significant 29.7% difference.
  • Moreover, in thermal testing, the RX 7600 demonstrates impressive temperature management with an average of 69°C, while the Arc A750 closely follows at 70°C, resulting in a marginal 1.4% difference.
  • Furthermore, regarding power consumption, the Arc A750 demonstrates lower efficiency by consuming 166.4W, while the RX 7600 closely follows with better efficiency at 160W, resulting in a 3.9% difference.
  • In addition, when it comes to 1% low performance, the ARC A750 achieves 46 FPS, while the RX 7600 outperforms with 59 FPS, showcasing a notable difference of 24.7%.

Mafia Definitive Edition

Mafia Definitive Edition
Mafia Definitive Edition 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Starting off, during benchmarking, the Arc A750 achieves an average FPS of 82, while the RX 7600 shines with a remarkable 130 FPS, resulting in an impressive 45.2% divergence.
  • Moreover, while rigorous thermal testing, the Arc A750 maintains a solid average temperature of 64°C, while the RX 7600 exhibits a slightly higher temperature of 68°C, resulting in a 6% difference.
  • In addition, while testing the power consumption tests, the Arc A750 impresses with its consumption of 131.6W, while the RX 7600 exhibits a higher consumption of 163W, resulting in a notable 21.3% difference.
  • Furthermore, the ARC A750 achieves 49 FPS in 1% low performance, while the RX 7600 demonstrates superior performance with 81 FPS, resulting in a significant difference of 49.2%.

Also Read: Radeon RX 6700 XT Vs GeForce RTX 3080

Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2
Red Dead Redemption 2 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Firstly, it is worth noting that the Arc A750 lags behind with an average FPS of 64, whereas the RX 7600 excels with a notable 106 FPS, showcasing a significant 49.4% difference.
  • In addition, the Arc A750 and RX 7600 achieve similar thermal performance with an average temperature of 70°C vs 69°C, resulting in a difference of 1.4%.
  • Furthermore, both the Arc A750 and RX 7600 achieve similar power consumption, with the Arc A750 consuming more power at 166.9W and the RX 7600 closely following at 163W, resulting in a marginal 2.3% difference.
  • Moreover, the ARC A750 achieves 57 FPS in 1% low performance, while the RX 7600 showcases stronger performance with 77 FPS, resulting in a notable difference of 29.8%.

Cyberpunk 2077 (Ray Tracing)

Cyberpunk 2077 (Ray Tracing)
Cyberpunk 2077 (Ray Tracing) 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Starting off, when comparing average FPS, the Arc A750 achieves 55 FPS, while the RX 7600 demonstrates a slightly better performance of 59 FPS, resulting in a marginal 7% discrepancy.
  • Moreover, in terms of thermal statistics, the Arc A750 showcases an average temperature of 67°C, while the RX 7600 follows closely at 70°C, resulting in a notable 4.3% difference.
  • Furthermore, while going over power consumption, the Arc A750 showcases a consumption of 170.4W, while the RX 7600 shows improved power efficiency at 164W, resulting in a notable 3.8% difference.
  • In addition, during the 1% lows performance test, the ARC A750 achieves 42 FPS, while the RX 7600 follows closely with 46 FPS, resulting in a marginal difference of 9%.

Minecraft

Minecraft
Minecraft 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Notably, the Arc A750 exhibits an average FPS of 55, whereas the RX 7600 delivers a lower 33 FPS, showcasing a substantial 50% difference in performance.
  • Moreover, the Arc A750 exhibits an average temperature of 69°C, while the RX 7600 maintains a slightly lower temperature of 66°C, showcasing a marginal 4.4% difference in thermal performance.
  • Furthermore, the Arc A750 exhibits higher power consumption at 186.1W, while the RX 7600 maintains a lower consumption of 163W, showcasing a significant 13.2% difference in power efficiency.
  • In addition, the ARC A750 achieves 41 FPS in 1% low performance, while the RX 7600 showcases a lower performance with 27 FPS, resulting in a significant difference of 41.1%.

Overall Gaming Performance

Overall Gaming Performance
Overall Gaming Performance 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)

In the arena of benchmark tests, a standout performer has emerged from the clash between the RX 7600 vs Arc A750 graphics cards, showcasing its dominance over its counterpart.

  • To begin with, after our thorough benchmark analysis, it is evident that the RX 7600 outshines the Arc A750 with its impressive average FPS and outstanding 1% lows in a variety of gaming scenarios.
  • Moreover, when it comes to gaming performance, the RX 7600 truly shines, surpassing the Arc A750 with a remarkable average FPS of 102.9. In comparison, the Arc A750 falls behind due to its average FPS of 81.4.
  • To sum up, after a thorough evaluation, it is evident that the RX 7600 surpasses the Arc A750 in terms of FPS performance with a remarkable 23.3% lead.

Also Read: RTX 2060 Super vs RTX 3060

Average Power Consumption

Average Power Consumption
Average Power Consumption 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)

As we continue our analysis, let’s take a closer look at the power consumption of the RX 7600 and Arc A750 graphics cards, uncovering key observations from our comprehensive benchmark testing.

  • Firstly, a minimum 450W power supply is recommended for optimal performance for the RX 7600. Its TDP of 165W necessitates a sufficient power source to ensure stable and efficient operation.
  • In contrast, pairing the Arc A750 with a reliable 550W power supply is advisable for efficient power delivery. This recommendation considers the graphics card’s TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 225W.
  • Hence, when considering the thermal design and power consumption, the RX 7600 emerges as the clear winner, showcasing a remarkable 30.7% advantage over the Arc A750 in terms of TDP.
  • Contrary to expectations, the Arc A750 demonstrated slightly lower average power consumption during benchmark tests, consuming 155W, compared to the RX 7600’s 158.2W.
  • In conclusion, the Arc A750 showcases a slight power efficiency advantage, consuming approximately 1.9% less power on average in comparison to the RX 7600.

Average Thermal Statistics

Average Thermal Statistics
Average Thermal Statistics 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)

When considering the Average Thermal Statistics, evaluating the thermal management capabilities of the Arc A750 and RX 7600 is important. Here are some key insights from our benchmark analysis:

  • Upon careful analysis of benchmark test results, it becomes clear that the Arc A750 takes the lead in terms of thermal efficiency when compared to the RX 7600.
  • Moreover, the Arc A750 outshines the RX 7600 in thermal efficiency, maintaining cooler average temperatures at 66.3°C compared to the RX 7600’s 68.1°C.
  • To summarize, the Arc A750 emerges as the indisputable champion in terms of thermal efficiency, exhibiting a notable 2.6% lead over the RX 7600 based on benchmark results.

Pricing And Availability

Regarding pricing and availability, it’s important to note that the RX 7600 and Arc A750 graphics cards have distinct price points. The RX 7600 is currently priced at around 269 USD, while the Arc A750 comes with a slightly higher price tag of approximately 289 USD, leading to a price difference of 7.1%.

However, it’s essential to consider factors such as regional variations, promotions, and market dynamics, as these can affect the actual prices and availability. Additionally, different card variants and models may have their own pricing and availability considerations to consider during the decision-making process.

Arc A750 Vs RX 7600: Which One To Buy?

  • To kick things off, the Arc A750 has a price tag 7.1% lower than the RX 7600. However, it falls short of delivering the impressive 23.3% average FPS performance boost compared to the latter.
  • In contrast, the Arc A750 outshines the RX 7600 in terms of efficiency, consuming approximately 1.9% less power and maintaining an average temperature of 2.6% lower.
  • Finally, while the RX 7600 demonstrates superior benchmark performance over the Arc A750, the latter offers cost efficiency, lower power consumption, and improved temperature management compared to the RX 7600.

Also Read: RTX 2060 Vs AMD RX 6600 XT

Pros And Cons

GPU Pros Cons
Arc A750
  • Performs amazingly well at 1080p resolution
  • Comes with a minimalist yet appealing design
  • Only provides 8GB VRAM which is not future-proof
Radeon RX 7600
  • Delivers stunning gaming performance at 1080p
  • Can provide the optimum performance by only using an 8-pin power connector
  • Ray tracing performance needs improvement

When faced with the decision between the RX 7600 and Arc A750, it can be difficult to determine which GPU is the better choice. To assist you in making an informed decision, we recommend exploring our website, where you’ll discover comprehensive reviews of two other impressive graphics cards: the ARC A770 and RTX 3060 Ti.

Our detailed evaluations encompass a range of factors, including performance benchmarks, technical specifications, and user experiences, allowing you to gain valuable insights and find the GPU that best suits your gaming requirements.

FAQs

Which graphics card, the Arc A750 or the RX 7600, offers better gaming performance?

The RX 7600 provides superior gaming performance, delivering a higher average FPS than the Arc A750.

Which graphics card consumes less power, the Arc A750 or the RX 7600?

The Arc A750 has a slight power efficiency advantage, consuming approximately 1.9% less power on average than the RX 7600.

Does the Arc A750 or the RX 7600 exhibit better thermal management?

The Arc A750 showcases superior thermal efficiency, maintaining lower average temperatures by 2.6% compared to the RX 7600.

Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Related articles

Core i5-13400 Vs Ryzen 5 7600 [We Tested 9 Games]

In this Core i5-13400 vs Ryzen 5 7600 battle, we are going to compare both processors in detail to help you select the right one.

RTX 4070 Ti Vs RTX 3080 Ti [Gaming Benchmarks + Overall]

Our GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3080 Ti guide compares both GPUs in detail to help you select the right one for your build.

Core i9-14900K Vs i7-13700K: We Tested 13 Games

In our Core i9-14900K vs i7-13700K comparison, we examined the technical specifications and gaming performance of both CPUs thoroughly..

RTX 3060 Vs 3060 Ti: Should You Upgrade? [2023 Tests]

In RTX 3060 Vs. 3060 Ti comparison, we will benchmark these cards at 1440p to determine if the extra VRAM makes any significant difference.

Core i9-12900K vs Ryzen 7-5800X3D [We Tested 11 Games]

In the i9-12900K vs Ryzen 7-5800X3D CPU war, even though the same processor node, the 5800X3D can go head-to-head with Intel's best CPU.

Similar Guides