Ryzen 9 7950X3D Vs Intel i9-13900K: Which Is Better?

AMD has been trying to catch up to its rival, Intel, since the dawn of its Ryzen processors. We have often seen Intel and AMD processors tie in many games and creative tasks, but Intel usually grabs the gaming crown. However, the scenario might change with AMD’s latest Ryzen 7000 series 3D V-Cache stacked processors. Therefore, today let’s compare the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K processors.

Key Takeaways

• Ryzen 9 7950X3D only houses a more excellent L3 cache pool than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X processor.
• Ryzen 9 7950X3D has a price tag of $699, while the Intel Core i9-13900K has a price tag of $589.
• At 1080P resolution, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is ~2.53% faster than its competitor.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D Vs Intel i9-13900K

Comparison Table

Architectural Differences

• TDP: AMD’s Ryzen 9 7950X3D has a TDP of 120W, which is lower than the Core i9-13900K’s 125W power draw. This makes the Ryzen 9 slightly less power-hungry, at least on paper.
• Core Count and Threads: The Ryzen 9 7950X3D features 16 cores and 32 threads. The Core i9-13900K offers 8 performance (P) cores and 16 efficiency (E) cores, resulting in a total of 24 cores and 32 threads. Both processors end up having the same core count, but the way they get there is very different.
• Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D has a base clock speed of 4.2GHz and a boost clock speed of 5.7GHz. The Core i9-13900K operates at a base clock speed of 3.00GHz for P-cores and 2.20GHz for E-cores, with a boost clock speed of 5.40GHz for P-cores and 4.30GHz for E-cores. The higher core clocks of the Ryzen, along with an equivalent number of threads, promise great results.
• Memory Support: The Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports only DDR5 memory with speeds of up to 5200MHz. The Core i9-13900K supports DDR4 memory up to 3200MHz and DDR5 memory up to 5600MHz.
• Cache: The Ryzen 9 7950X3D features 16MB of L2 cache and a substantial 128MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core i9-13900K comes with 32MB of L2 cache and 36MB of L3 cache. The larger cache of the Ryzen comes in very handy in gaming scenarios.

Gaming Benchmarks

The best method to compare two similar pieces of hardware is through practical benchmark tests. Therefore, we shall test both processors in multiple games at 1080P resolution to stress the processors as much as possible.

Testing Rig

• Motherboard: Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master & ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming
• CPU cooler: Be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
• Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 24GB
• RAM: G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5 6000MHz CL32
• Power supply: Corsair RM850i 850W
• Storage: 2 x Samsung 970 Evo M.2 2280 1TB
• Processors: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D & Intel Core i9-13900K

Microsoft Flight Simulator

• In our testing, the Ryzen 9 averages 124 FPS, outpacing the Core i9-13900K’s 117 FPS by approximately 5.98%.
• Our tests show that the AMD processor is more power-efficient, consuming only 46W, while the Intel chip draws 82W.
• When it comes to temperatures, our measurements indicate that the Core i9-13900K runs marginally cooler at 57°C, while the 7950X3D records a temperature of 58°C.
• In terms of 1% lows, the Intel chip excels, losing approximately 21.87% of frames compared to its average, whereas the Ryzen 9 lags behind, losing around 30.52% of frames.

Hogwarts Legacy

• Hogwarts Legacy performed better on our AMD processor, with an average framerate of 78 FPS, while the Intel processor had an average of 73 FPS. The difference here was around 6.84%, with the Ryzen 9 in the advantage.
• In terms of power efficiency, our tests reveal that the AMD processor consumes 65W, while the Core i9 draws 88W.
• Our temperature measurements indicate that the 7950X3D runs slightly hotter at 63°C, whereas the Intel processor maintains temperatures at 60°C.
• When it comes to 1% lows, our tests show that the Intel chip exhibits better performance, with a 40.38% loss of frames, while the Ryzen 9 lags slightly behind with a 41.81% frame loss.

Also Read: Intel Core i9-13900K Vs Intel Core i7-13700K

Call Of Duty Warfare 2.0

• In our testing, the Core i9-13900K takes a slight lead by being 1.58% faster at 192 FPS, while the Ryzen 9 averages 189 FPS.
• The AMD processor continues to exhibit its power efficiency, consuming 81W, while the Intel chip consumes 103W, as our tests show.
• Our temperature measurements reveal that the Intel processor runs slightly cooler, at 59°C, while the 7950X3D has a temperature of 61°C.
• When it comes to 1% lows, our tests indicate that the Ryzen 9 performs better, losing 42.1% of frames. In comparison, the Intel chip loses 43.28% of frames.

Cyberpunk 2077

• In our testing, the Intel chip maintains its lead by staying approximately 3.57% faster, averaging 145 FPS, while the Ryzen 9 records an average of 140 FPS.
• The 7950X3D impresses with significantly better power efficiency, consuming only 92W, while the Intel Core i9-13900K consumes 135W, according to our tests.
• Our temperature measurements show that the Ryzen 9 keeps things cooler at 61°C, whereas the Intel processor runs at 65°C.
• When it comes to 1% lows, our tests reveal that the Intel Core i9-13900K excels, losing approximately 19.83% of frames, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D loses 21.73% of frames.

Horizon Zero Dawn

• The Ryzen 9 7950X3D showcases a significant leap in performance, being 21.91% faster, with an average of 267 FPS, whereas the Intel chip averages 219 FPS in our testing.
• The 7950X3D maintains its efficiency by consuming 98W, while the Core i9-13900K shows higher power consumption at 111W, according to our tests.
• Our temperature measurements reveal that the Intel processor has lower temperatures at 60°C, whereas the Ryzen 9 runs hotter at 68°C.
• In terms of 1% lows, our tests indicate that the Core i9-13900K performs slightly better, with a 46.97% loss of frames, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D loses 47.51% of frames.

Hitman 3

• The Ryzen 9 7950X3D maintains a slight lead, being approximately 3.84% faster, with an average of 270 FPS, while the Core i9-13900K averages 260 FPS in our tests.
• In terms of power consumption, the 7950X3D shows lower power usage at 76W, whereas the Core i9-13900K draws 97W, according to our testing.
• Both processors exhibit similar temperatures, with the Intel processor being 1°C cooler at 59°C, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D sits at 60°C in our tests.
• When it comes to 1% lows, our tests reveal that the Core i9-13900K performs slightly better, losing approximately 30.65% of frames, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D loses around 31.06% of frames.

God Of War

• The Core i9-13900K regains the lead by being approximately 2.49% faster, with an average of 255 FPS, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D averages 243 FPS in our testing.
• The 7950X3D impresses with significantly lower power consumption, at 95W, whereas the Core i9-13900K consumes 128W power, according to our tests.
• Our temperature measurements show that the Intel processor is slightly colder at 65°C, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D registers a temperature of 68°C.
• In terms of 1% lows, our tests indicate that the Ryzen 9 7950X3D performs better, with a frame loss of approximately 22.11%, whereas the Core i9-13900K loses around 23.78% of frames.

Forza Horizon 5

• The Intel processor takes a slight lead by averaging 308 FPS and being approximately 1.31% faster, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D averages 304 FPS according to our tests.
• The Ryzen 9 7950X3D impressively maintains its power efficiency, consuming only 72W, in contrast to the Core i9-13900K, which draws 98W power according to our testing.
• Both processors exhibit similar temperatures, with the Core i9-13900K being 1°C colder at 58°C, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D records a temperature of 59°C in our tests.
• When it comes to 1% lows, our tests reveal that the Ryzen 9 7950X3D performs significantly better, losing approximately 31.61% of frames, whereas the Core i9-13900K loses around 83.33% of frames.

Spider-Man Miles Morales

• The Intel processor leads by approximately 5.9%, averaging 125 FPS, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D averages 118 FPS, according to our tests.
• The Ryzen 9 7950X3D demonstrates significantly lower power consumption at 91W, in contrast to the Core i9-13900K, which consumes 129W power according to our testing.
• The Ryzen 9 7950X3D maintains a slightly cooler temperature at 63°C, while the Core i9-13900K operates at 64°C based on our tests.
• In terms of 1% lows, our testing reveals that the Core i9-13900K performs better, losing approximately 48.8% of frames, whereas the Ryzen 9 7950X3D loses around 51.28% of frames.

Witcher 3

• The Ryzen 9 7950X3D regains the lead by approximately 6.9%, averaging 92 FPS, while the i9-13900K averages 86 FPS based on our testing.
• The Ryzen 9 7950X3D maintains consistent power efficiency, consuming only 94W, while the 13900K consumes 106W, according to our tests.
• Both processors exhibit similar temperatures, operating at 63°C.
• In terms of 1% lows, our testing reveals that the Ryzen 9 7950X3D performs better, losing approximately 37.31% of frames, whereas the Core i9-13900K loses around 40.98% of frames.

Overall Gaming Performance

Framerate

• The Ryzen 9 7950X3D averages 182.5 FPS at 1080P resolution in 10 games. On the other hand, the i9-13900K averages 178 FPS.
• The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2.52% faster than the Intel Core i9-13900K, while the former is 18.67% more expensive.

Power Consumption

• Throughout the 10 games we tested, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D consistently showcased lower power consumption.
• The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is more power efficient, with an average power consumption of 81W. On the other hand, the Intel Core i9-13900K has an average power consumption of 108W.
• The Intel Core i9-13900K consumes 33.33% more power than its rival but performs slower overall.
• The Ryzen 9 7950X3D has a better performance-per-watt value, gaining 22.53 FPS per watt. Meanwhile, the Intel Core i9-13900K gains 16.48 FPS per watt.

Temperatures

• The Intel Core i9-13900K has slightly lower temperatures averaging 61°C than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, averaging 62°C.
• In percentages, the Intel Core i9-13900K is ~1.64% colder than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. However, the latter is ~2.52% faster.

Pricing And Availability

• The component and competitor’s prices are one of the most critical purchase factors. Thus, when comparing two processors, we must examine their pricing and availability status. For example, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an MSRP cost of $699. Meanwhile, the Core i9-13900K has an MSRP cost of $589.
• So, the Intel Core i9-13900K has an advantageous price, as its competitor costs 18.67% more. Therefore, if we discuss performance-per-dollar values, the Intel Core i9-13900K has a greater chance of having better value and catching the eye of the budget gamer.
• On the other hand, when discussing availability, the Core i9-13900K has been in the market for longer than its rival. As such, the product has been re-shelved and used more. For that reason, you’re more likely to find the Intel processor more quickly than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D in the market.

Intel Core i9-13900K Vs AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D: What We Recommend

• The Intel Core i9-13900K is a better choice for people looking for a better deal, as it costs less and offers similar performance to the more expensive AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, which is only marginally faster.
• The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D i has better power efficiency, as it delivers more performance per watt compared to the Core i9-13900K.
• The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D has better overall performance than the Intel processor, making it the preferred choice for users prioritizing high performance. The choice ultimately depends on the individual’s specific needs and use-case scenario.

Pros And Cons

More From Core i9-13900K

• Core i9 13900K Vs Apple M2 Ultra
• i9-13900K Vs i9-12900K
• i9-12900KS Vs i9-13900K

More From Ryzen 9 7950X3D

• Ryzen 9 7950X3D Vs i9-13900KS
• Ryzen 7 7800X3D Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Abde Manaf

[Comparisons Expert]

Abdemanaf is a skilled creative writer who has been honing his craft since 2011. While initially working in different fields, he found a passion for technology and has been exploring the tech world since early 2015. Over the years, he has developed an in-depth knowledge of the latest tech trends and product offerings by various companies.

Abdemanaf’s writing reflects his analytical mindset and ability to think critically. He has a knack for breaking down complex technical information into easily digestible pieces, making his articles engaging and accessible to readers from all backgrounds. In February 2022, he joined Tech4Gamers as a blog and product comparison writer, where he has been able to hone his skills further.

As a writer, Abdemanaf is dedicated to staying up-to-date with the latest technological advancements and trends, enabling him to provide readers with the most relevant and accurate information. He is always eager to learn more and is constantly seeking new challenges to improve his skills.

Get In Touch: [email protected]